Promoting physical activity among community groups of older women in socio-economically disadvantaged areas: randomised feasibility study

Table 6 Participant responses to exit questionnaire

Question	Response	Immediate intervention			Delayed intervention
		Group 1 (n = 9)	Group 2 (n = 10)	Total (n = 19)^a	Group 3 (n = 12)	Group 4 (n = 9)	Total^a (n = 21)	Total^a (n = 40)
		n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)
Satisfied with involvement in study	Very satisfied	6	7	13	7	6	13	26 (65.0)
	Somewhat satisfied	2	1	3	3	2	5	8 (20.0)
	Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	1	0	1	1	1	2	3 (7.5)
	Somewhat dissatisfied	0	0	0	0	0	0	0 (0.0)
	Very dissatisfied	0	0	0	0	0	0	0 (0.0)
Satisfied with the advice/information received about this study	Very satisfied	6	7	13	8	8	16	29 (72.5)
	Somewhat satisfied	1	1	2	2	1	3	5 (12.5)
	Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	0	0	0	0	0	0	0 (0.0)
	Somewhat dissatisfied	0	0	0	0	0	0	0 (0.0)
	Very dissatisfied	0	0	0	0	0	0	0 (0.0)
How helpful was it having a buddy?	Great benefit	6	8	14	7	8	15	29 (72.5)
	Some benefit	2	0	2	2	1	3	5 (12.5)
	No benefit	0	0	0	1	0	1	1 (2.5)
How helpful was the information in the leaflet?	Great benefit	5	6	11	7	6	13	24 (60.0)
	Some benefit	3	2	5	3	3	6	11 (27.5)
	No benefit	0	0	0	1	0	1	1 (2.5)
	Don’t know	0	0	0	0	0	0	0 (0.0)
	Did not read it	0	0	0	0	0	0	0 (0.0)
Would you recommend this programme to a friend?	Yes	7	7	14	9	8	17	31 (77.5)
Would you recommend this programme to a friend?	No	0	1	1	0	1	1	2 (5.0)
Would you be happy to be involved in this programme again?	Yes	7	7	14	9	7	16	30 (75.0)
Would you be happy to be involved in this programme again?	No	1	1	2	0	2	2	4 (10.0)

^a Total responses for all questions do not correspond to total number of participants because not all participants provided a response for each question

ISSN: 1745-6215