Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison by treatment group at each assessment period

From: Comparative effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for non-acute low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Variables

Group

 

P value*

CMT (n = 20)

Mean [95% CI]

UC (n = 20)

Mean [95% CI]

CMT + UC (n = 20)

Mean [95% CI]

 

NRS (LBP)

 1st Week

5.80 [5.18, 6.42]

5.50 [5.01, 5.99]

6.05 [5.51, 6.59]

0.176c

 7th Week

2.53 [1.78, 3.28]

3.55 [2.73, 4.37]

4.30 [3.25, 5.35]

0.016b

 Difference

− 3.28 [− 4.08, − 2.47]

−1.95 [− 2.82, − 1.08]

−1.75 [− 2.70, − 0.80]

0.021c

P value

< 0.001e

< 0.001f

0.005f

 

NRS (leg pain)

 1st Week

3.60 [2.23, 4.97]

1.85 [0.70, 3.00]

4.40 [2.98, 5.82]

0.018c

 7th Week

1.15 [0.40, 1.90]

1.15 [0.45, 1.85]

2.55 [1.53, 3.57]

0.053c

 Difference

− 2.45 [− 3.53, − 1.37]

−0.70 [− 1.73, 0.33]

−1.85 [− 3.10, − 0.60]

0.096c

P value

< 0.001f

0.140f

0.015f

 

ODI

 1st Week

25.17 [22.12, 28.22]

26.06 [22.42, 29.70]

28.47 [24.55, 28.57]

0.388b

 7th Week

12.88 [9.00, 16.75]

15.71 [11.39, 20.04]

19.20 [13.75, 24.65]

0.135b

 Difference

− 12.29 [− 16.86, − 7.72]

−10.34 [− 14.63, − 6.06]

−9.27 [− 14.28, − 4.26]

0.933c

P value

< 0.001e

< 0.001f

0.001e

 

PGIC

 1st Week

 7th Week

6.00 [5.60, 6.39]

5.06 [4.62, 5.49]

5.53 [5.06, 5.99]

0.011c

EQ-5D (points)

 1st Week

0.70 [0.62, 0.79]

0.74 [0.71, 0.76]

0.63 [0.53, 0.73]

0.078c

 7th Week

0.88 [0.79, 0.92]

0.81 [0.75, 0.87]

0.77 [0.70, 0.84]

0.180c

 Difference

0.16 [0.06, 0.25]

0.07 [0.01, 0.14]

0.14 [0.03, 0.25]

0.421b

P value

0.002f

0.033f

0.019f

 

HUI-III

 1st Week

0.88 [0.82, 0.93]

0.88 [0.82, 0.94]

0.91 [0.87, 0.95]

0.750c

 7th Week

0.95 [0.92, 0.98]

0.93 [0.89, 0.97]

0.91 [0.86, 0.95]

0.233c

 Difference

0.07 [0.02, 0.17]

0.05 [−0.01, 0.11]

0.00 [− 0.04, 0.03]

0.037c

P value

0.011f

0.054f

0.857f

 

ROM (flexion)

 1st Week

89.00 [84.60, 93.40]

89.30 [85.71, 92.89]

81.65 [73.10, 90.20]

0.261c

 7th Week

94.00 [90.01, 97.99]

88.50 [83.35, 93.66]

88.00 [79.60, 96.40]

0.253c

 Difference

5.00 [−0.68, 10.68]

−0.80 [− 3.77, 2.17]

6.35 [− 0.46, 13.16]

0.026c

P value

0.063f

0.579e

0.049f

 
  1. All values are mean ± standard deviation. *Statistical analysis was conducted based on intension-to-treat analysis, imputing by the method of last observation carried forward.
  2. CMT Chuna manual therapy, UC usual care, CI confidence interval, NRS numerical rating scale, LBP low back pain, ODI Oswestry Disability Index, PGIC Patient’s Global Impression of Change, EQ-5D EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire, HUI-III Health Utility Index, ROM range of motion
  3. aP values were adjusted for observed value at baseline by using baseline value as covariate in analysis of covariance
  4. bP values were derived from analysis of variance
  5. cP values were derived from the Kruskal-Wallis test
  6. dP values were derived from the paired t test
  7. eP values were derived from the Wilcoxon signed-rank test