Skip to main content

Table 7 Mean change between baseline and follow-up in quality of life, capability and patient activation for individual practices, intervention combined and usual care

From: Improving primary care Access in Context and Theory (I-ACT trial): a theory-informed randomised cluster feasibility trial using a realist perspective

 

Practice

Intervention total (n = 27)

Usual care (n = 4)

Difference in difference (95% CI)

A (n = 18)

B (n = 5)

C (n = 4)

EQ-5D-5 L, mean (SD)

 Baseline

0.75 (0.20)

0.77 (0.16)

0.88 (0.09)

0.77 (0.18)

0.67 (0.37)

− 0.17 (− 0.33 to − 0.02)

 Follow-up

0.64 (0.23)

0.72 (0.16)

0.83 (0.08)

0.68 (0.21)

0.75 (0.32)

 Difference

− 0.11 (0.14)

− 0.05 (0.12)

− 0.05 (0.07)

− 0.09 (0.13)

0.09 (0.08)

ICECAP-O, mean (SD)

 Baseline

0.81 (0.14)

0.81 (0.10)

0.86 (0.11)

0.81 (0.13)

0.88 (0.15)

− 0.01 (− 0.14 to 0.11)

 Follow-up

0.73 (0.14)

0.77 (0.10)

0.86 (0.11)

0.76 (0.14)

0.84 (0.18)

 Difference

− 0.08 (0.11)

− 0.04 (0.08)

0.01 (0.05)

− 0.06 (0.10)

− 0.04 (0.04)

PAM, mean (SD)

 Baseline

62.17 (13.40)

56.08 (14.67)

48.27 (6.79)

59.39 (13.52)

79.43 (19.76)

22.88 (5.92 to 39.83)

 Follow-up

60.47 (12.80)

64.86 (14.40)

48.73 (5.95)

59.96 (12.95)

58.10 (15.80)

 Difference

− 1.69 (11.58)

8.78 (12.16)

0.47 (2.43)

0.57 (11.51)

− 21.33 (21.20)

  1. CI confidence interval, EQ-5D-5 L EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire, ICECAP-O  ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people, PAM Patient Activation Measure, SD standard deviation