How context can impact clinical trials: a multi-country qualitative case study comparison of diagnostic biomarker test interventions
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Apr 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leila Rooshenas|
|31 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Clare Clement|
|3 Dec 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Marco J Haenssgen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Dec 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Clare Clement|
|31 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leila Rooshenas|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|8 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13063-019-3215-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.