COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Jul 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Belinda von Niederhäusern|
|29 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Moher|
|16 Feb 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Ben Goldacre|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Feb 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Belinda von Niederhäusern|
|28 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Moher|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|14 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13063-019-3172-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.