Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
25 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Belinda von Niederhäusern
29 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Moher
16 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ben Goldacre
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Belinda von Niederhäusern
28 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Moher
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
2 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
14 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s13063-019-3172-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement