Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between education level and SBP, DBP, and concentration of LDL-C

From: Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up benefits stroke/TIA patients with low education: a randomized controlled trial sub-study

 

Intervention group

Control group

 

Education level

Between-group difference (95% CI)

Education level

Between-group difference (95% CI)

 

High

Low

 

High

Low

 

SBP

N = 197

N = 186

 

N = 186

N = 202

 

 1 month, mean (SD)*

135.9 (19.4)

138.2 (15.4)

NS

136.1 (17.9)

138.3 (19.7)

NS

 12 months, mean (SD)

130.9 (17.9)

133.5 (15.6)

NS

133.6 (16.6)

137.8 (17.7)

4.2 (0.8 to 7.6)

 Mean change between 1 and 12 months (95% CI)

−4.9 (−2.1 to −7.8)

−4.8 (−1.9 to −7.6)

 

−2.5 (−0.2 to −4.8)

NS

 

DBP

N = 197

N = 186

 

N = 186

N = 202

 

 1 month, mean (SD)*

81.8 (12.1)

79.2 (11.3)

2.6 (0.2 to 5.0)

81.9 (11.4)

78.9 (10.4)

3.0 (0.8 to 5.2)

 12 months, mean (SD)

78.9 (10.6)

77.2 (10.3)

NS

80.8 (10.3)

79.8 (10.1)

NS

 Mean change between 1 and 12 months (95% CI)

−2.9 (−1.0 to −4.8)

−2.1 (−0.4 to −3.7)

 

NS

NS

 

LDL-C

N = 190

N = 182

 

N = 179

N = 197

 

 1 month, mean (SD)

2.5 (0.8)

2.5 (0.8)

NS

2.4 (0.8)

2.4 (0.8)

NS

 12 months, mean (SD)§

2.4 (0.9)

2.2 (0.7)

0.2 (0.1 to 0.4)

2.5 (0.8)

2.6 (1.0)

NS

 Mean change between 1 and 12 months (95% CI)

NS

−0.3 (−0.2 to −0.4)

 

NS

0.2 (0.1 to 0.3)

 
  1. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, DBP diastolic blood pressure, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, NS not significant, SBP systolic blood pressure, SD standard deviation
  2. *In the control group, two values missing for each education level. In the intervention group, one value missing in the high-education group
  3. The LDL-C analyses did not include participants with hemorrhagic stroke as the qualifying event.
  4. In the control group, four and two values missing in the high- and low-education groups, respectively. In the intervention group, one value missing in the high-education group
  5. §In the control group, two and four values missing in the high- and low-education groups, respectively. In the intervention group, three values missing from each education level