Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Effect of dual-acupoint and single-acupoint electric stimulation on postoperative outcomes in elderly patients subjected to gastrointestinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
5 Mar 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yan Cao
13 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Kowark
29 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Zhi-hong Lu
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Kowark
16 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Zhi-hong Lu
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Zhi-hong Lu
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Nov 2018 Editorially accepted
4 Dec 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13063-018-3052-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement