An analysis of reporting quality of prospective studies examining community antibiotic use and resistance
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 May 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic|
|5 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Gray|
|17 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philip Pallmann|
|1 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Mina Bakhit|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic|
|22 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philip Pallmann|
|24 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Gray|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Nov 2018||Editorially accepted|
|27 Nov 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13063-018-3040-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.