Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of the 59 scientific advice (SA)/protocol assistance (PA) procedures in the years 2007–2012 from the initial survey [39] categorised by matching status

From: Adaptive designs in clinical trials: from scientific advice to marketing authorisation to the European Medicine Agency

Variable

 

31 retrieved trials (n (%))

28 non-retrieved trials (n (%))

Type of medicinal product

New chemical entity

10 (32%)

13 (46%)

Known chemical entity

10 (32%)

3 (11%)

New biological

9 (29%)

4 (14%)

Known biological

1 (3%)

5 (18%)

Advanced therapy

1 (3%)

3 (11%)

Therapeutic area of the indication of the medicinal product

Infectious disorders

3 (10%)

1 (4%)

Oncology

14 (45%)

13 (46%)

Endocrine and metabolic disorders

1 (3%)

2 (7%)

Neurologic and psychiatric disorders

2 (6%)

1 (4%)

Cardiovascular

5 (16%)

5 (18%)

Diagnostics

2 (6%)

4 (14%)

Respiratory

0 (0%)

1 (4%)

Dermatology

2 (6%)

1 (4%)

Others

2 (6%)

0 (0%)

Rare disease (prevalence of < 5/10,000)

 

21 (68%)

14 (50%)

Applied for orphan designation

 

10 (32%)

11 (39%)

Small or medium enterprise

 

8 (26%)

7 (25%)

Year when the SA/PA letter was issued

2007

4 (13%)

3 (11%)

2008

7 (23%)

2 (7%)

2009

3 (10%)

4 (14%)

2010

7 (23%)

4 (14%)

2011

8 (26%)

10 (36%)

2012

2 (6%)

5 (18%)

Scale of measurement of the primary endpoint discussed

Time to event

15 (48%)

13 (46%)

Binary

12 (39%)

8 (29%)

Continuous

4 (13%)

7 (25%)

Adaptive study is the only pivotal trial

 

24 (77%)

20 (71%)

Development phase for which the adaptive clinical trial is proposed

Phase II or IIb

3 (10%)

1 (4%)

Phase II/III

8 (26%)

8 (29%)

Phase III

19 (61%)

19 (68%)

Pediatric study

1 (3%)

0 (0%)

Number of arms of the adaptive trial discussed

1

1 (3%)

1 (4%)

2

15 (48%)

19 (68%)

3

9 (29%)

6 (21%)

> 3

6 (19%)

2 (7%)

Stopping for futility was planned for in the adaptive trial

Yes

17 (55%)

14 (50%)

Stopping for efficacy was planned for in the adaptive trial

Yes

8 (26%)

11 (39%)

Number of interim analyses planned in the adaptive trial

1

21 (68%)

22 (79%)

2

8 (26%)

5 (18%)

> 2

2 (6%)

1 (4%)

Type of adaptations planned (multiple answers possible)

Sample size reassessment

19 (61%)

24 (86%)

Population enrichment

1 (3%)

4 (14%)

Dropping of treatment arms

13 (42%)

6 (21%)

Other adaptations

3 (10%)

1 (4%)

CHMP raised issues regarding type I error rate control

 

14 (45%)

5 (18%)

Categorisation of the CHMP advice regarding the adaptive study design

Accepted

7 (23%)

8 (29%)

Accepted conditionally (concerns to be addressed)

17 (55%)

15 (54%)

Not accepted

7 (23%)

5 (18%)