Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of dexmedetomidine vs. remifentanil combined with sevoflurane during radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
26 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Xiaoxia Duan
15 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sebastian Ziemann
14 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jingru Pan
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Xiaoxia Duan
14 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sebastian Ziemann
22 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jingru Pan
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sebastian Ziemann
16 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jingru Pan
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Oct 2018 Editorially accepted
8 Jan 2019 Article published 10.1186/s13063-018-3010-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement