Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Low-chloride versus high-chloride hypertonic solution for the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage-related complications (The ACETatE trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
30 Mar 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Arundel
31 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yuan Shi
30 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ofer Sadan
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yuan Shi
7 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Arundel
15 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ofer Sadan
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Arundel
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Oct 2018 Editorially accepted
14 Nov 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13063-018-3007-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement