Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Jan 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Mar 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erick Turner|
|22 Mar 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alberto Falk Delgado|
|15 Jun 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Constance Zou|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Jun 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alberto Falk Delgado|
|5 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erick Turner|
|9 Aug 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Constance Zou|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Aug 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Oct 2018||Editorially accepted|
|23 Oct 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13063-018-2957-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.