Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
17 Jan 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erick Turner
22 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alberto Falk Delgado
15 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Constance Zou
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alberto Falk Delgado
5 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erick Turner
9 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Constance Zou
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
3 Oct 2018 Editorially accepted
23 Oct 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13063-018-2957-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement