Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics by study groups

From: Expert versus generalist inserters for peripheral intravenous catheter insertion: a pilot randomised controlled trial

 

n

VAS

n

Generalist

Total

Group sizea

 

69 (50)

 

69 (50)

138 (100)

Age (years)b

69

64.0 (47.0–73.0)

69

62.0 (47.0–71.0)

62.0 (47.0–73.0)

Sex: males

69

43 (62)

69

43 (62)

86 (62)

Weight category: overweight/obese

69

37 (54)

69

33 (48)

70 (51)

Skin integrity: good

69

41 (59)

69

36 (52)

77 (56)

Mobility at insertion:

69

 

69

  

 Independent

 

35 (51)

 

53 (77)

88 (64)

 Required assistance to mobilise

 

21 (30)

 

9 (13)

30 (22)

 Bed-bound

 

13 (19)

 

7 (10)

20 (14)

Reason for admission:

69

 

69

  

 Medical

 

19 (28)

 

19 (28)

38 (28)

 Surgical emergent

 

14 (20)

 

21 (30)

35 (25)

 Surgical elective

 

36 (52)

 

29 (42)

65 (47)

Infection at recruitment

69

21 (30)

69

21 (30)

42 (30)

Number of comorbidities:

69

 

69

  

 Zero

 

12 (17)

 

10 (14)

22 (16)

 One

 

17 (25)

 

15 (22)

32 (23)

 Two

 

11 (16)

 

17 (25)

28 (20)

 Three

 

8 (12)

 

9 (13)

17 (12)

 Four or more

 

21 (30)

 

18 (26)

39 (28)

Wound (present at recruitment)

69

42 (61)

69

40 (58)

82 (59)

Vein assessment:

69

 

69

  

 Excellent

 

18 (26)

 

25 (36)

43 (31)

 Good

 

14 (20)

 

19 (28)

33 (24)

 Fair or poor

 

37 (54)

 

25 (36)

62 (45)

Vein first choice for insertion:

69

 

69

  

 Cephalic

 

38 (55)

 

45 (65)

83 (60)

 Medial antebrachial

 

15 (22)

 

6 (9)

21 (15)

 Accessory cephalic

 

8 (12)

 

8 (12)

16 (16)

 Other

 

8 (12)

 

10 (14)

18 (13)

Location first choice for insertion:

69

 

69

  

 Posterior lower forearm

 

32 (46)

 

45 (65)

77 (56)

 Upper anterior forearm

 

20 (29)

 

7 (10)

27 (20)

 Wrist

 

12 (17)

 

10 (14)

22 (16)

 Other

 

5 (7)

 

7 (10)

12 (9)

Device sequence:

69

 

69

  

 Initial

 

3 (4)

 

0 (0)

3 (2)

 Subsequent

 

66 (96)

 

69 (100)

135 (98)

Reason for insertion:

69

 

69

  

 IV medications only

 

20 (29)

 

20 (29)

40 (29)

 IV medications and/or fluids

 

49 (71)

 

49 (71)

98 (71)

PVC is the appropriate device

69

58 (84)

69

55 (80)

113 (82)

Insertion difficulty (0 = none, 10 = max)b

69

2.0 (0.0–5.0)

11

2.0 (1.0–5.0)

2.0 (0.5–5.0)

Pain at insertion (0 = none, 10 = max)b

69

2.0 (1.0–3.0)

44

3.0 (1.0–4.0)

2.0 (1.0–3.0)

Device size (gauge):

69

 

50

  

 22

 

46 (67)

 

25 (50)

71 (60)

 20

 

21 (30)

 

19 (38)

40 (34)

 Other

 

2 (3)

 

2 (4)

4 (3)

 Not documented

 

0 (0)

 

4 (8)

4 (3)

Reason for choosing sizec:

69

 

11

  

 Clinician preference

 

41 (59)

 

10 (90)

51 (64)

 Patient has limited vein size

 

33 (48)

 

2 (18)

35 (44)

 Other

 

13 (19)

 

1 (9)

14 (18)

IV placement:

69

 

50

  

 Cephalic

 

31 (45)

 

20 (40)

51 (43)

 Medial antebrachial

 

16 (23)

 

3 (6)

19 (16)

 Accessory cephalic

 

10 (14)

 

3 (6)

13 (11)

 Metacarpal

 

3 (4)

 

10 (20)

13 (11)

 Other

 

9 (13)

 

14 (28)

23 (19)

IV location:

69

 

50

  

 Posterior lower forearm

 

26 (38)

 

13 (26)

39 (33)

 Upper anterior forearm

 

22 (32)

 

4 (8)

26 (22)

 Wrist

 

14 (20)

 

9 (18)

23 (19)

 Hand

 

3 (4)

 

14 (28)

17 (14)

 Other

 

4 (6)

 

10 (20)

14 (12)

Side of insertion: right

69

38 (55)

50

23 (46)

61 (51)

Skin hair prior to insertion:

69

 

50

  

 None present

 

31 (45)

 

31 (62)

62 (52)

 Clipped

 

38 (55)

 

3 (6)

41 (34)

 Unclipped

 

0 (0)

 

16 (32)

16 (13)

  1. Frequencies and column percentages shown, unless otherwise noted
  2. a Row percentages shown
  3. b Median and 25th–75th percentiles shown
  4. c Multiple responses allowed
  5. n number of non-missing observations, VAS vascular access specialist, IV intravenous, PVC peripheral intravenous catheter, max maximum