Skip to main content

Table 3 Use of fidelity frameworks/tools

From: Surveying knowledge, practice and attitudes towards intervention fidelity within trials of complex healthcare interventions

 

Number (%)

2011 Updated NIHBCC Treatment Fidelity Framework [16]

26 (10.1)

Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity

26 (10.1)

2004 NIHBCC Treatment Fidelity Framework [15]

19 (7.4)

Unsure/do not know

6 (2.3)

Comprehensive Intervention Fidelity Guide [24]

5 (1.9)

Other

15 (5.8)

 Medical Research Council Guidance on Process Evaluation of Complex Interventions [40]

3 (1.2)

 TIDieR checklist

2 (0.8)

 Developed specifically for study

1 (0.4)

 Multiple “ad hoc” publications consulted

1 (0.4)

 RE-AIM framework [41]

1 (0.4)

 Framework/Taxonomy of Implementation [42]

1 (0.4)

 Precede-Proceed [43]

1 (0.4)

 Conceptual Framework of Implementability [44]

1 (0.4)

 Process Evaluation “How-to” Guide [45]

1 (0.4)

 BCT Taxonomy v1 [46]

1 (0.4)

 Karas and Plankis 2016 [47]

1 (0.4)

 Durlak and DuPre 2008 [48]

1 (0.4)

 SPIRIT Intervention Fidelity Assessment Tool [49]

1 (0.4)

  1. NIHBCC National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium, BCT behaviour change techniques, TIDieR Template for intervention description and replication, RE-AIM Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance