Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of at-the-margins analysis for all three comparisons

From: Partial factorial trials: comparing methods for statistical analysis and economic evaluation

 

Comparison A: mobile bearing (n = 262) versus fixed bearing (n = 255)

Comparison B: metal-backed (n = 199) versus non-metal-backed (n = 203)

Comparison C: Patella resurfacing (n = 841) versus no resurfacing (n = 830)

Treatment group

 Cost

£8998 (£310)

£8235 (£272)

£8785 (£161)

 QALYs

5.007 (0.143)

5.219 (0.151)

5.297 (0.076)

 NMBa

£91,145 (£2968)

£96,145 (£3112)

£97,158 (£1551)

Control group

 Cost

£8913 (£405)

£8225 (£344)

£8889 (£211)

 QALYs

4.956 (0.141)

4.926 (0.152)

5.110 (0.080)

 NMBa

£90,209 (£2938)

£90,290 (£3144)

£93,308 (£1662)

Difference

 Cost

£85 (£508)

£10 (£440)

–£104 (£269)

 QALYs

0.051 (0.196)

0.293 (0.210)

0.187 (0.108)

 NMBa

£936 (£4087)

£5854 (£4343)

£3849 (£2235)

ICER (per QALY gained)

£1666

£35

Dominant

Probability cost-effectivea

0.59

0.91

0.96

Probability cost-saving

0.42

0.47

0.64

  1. Numbers in brackets are SEs
  2. aAt a £20,000/QALY ceiling ratio