Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Lessons learnt from a discontinued randomised controlled trial: adalimumab injection compared with placebo for patients receiving physiotherapy treatment for sciatica (Subcutaneous Injection of Adalimumab Trial compared with Control: SCIATiC)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
4 Dec 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bethan Copsey
13 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shengyuan Luo
14 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Beever
26 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Nefyn Williams
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shengyuan Luo
14 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vincent Cheng
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 Jul 2018 Editorially accepted
31 Jul 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13063-018-2801-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement