Variable type | Construct | Description | Timeline |
---|---|---|---|
Primary outcome | Reduced incidence of biologically confirmed STIs (i.e., chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis) | Biological assay for infection by Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis | Baseline, 12-month follow-up |
Secondary outcomes | HIV risk behaviors (number of unprotected sex acts; self-reported condom use) | Measured using NIDA’s Seek, Test, Treat and Retain for Vulnerable Populations: Data Harmonization Measure Sexual risk behavior items are based on the Women’s Health CoOp Baseline Questionnaire | Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month follow-up |
Viral load | Written confirmation of viral load information for HIV-positive participants provided by participant’s medical provider | Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month follow-up | |
Drug use | Measured using NIDA’s Seek, Test, Treat and Retain for Vulnerable Populations Data Harmonization Measure Injection risk behavior items are taken from the STTR Criminal Justice instrument | Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month follow-up | |
Use of drug treatment | Single-item question that inquires about participant’s current legal criminal justice status Participants are asked to select all responses that apply, including mandated drug treatment court sentence. | Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month follow-up | |
Intimate partner violence | IPV was assessed using three subscales from the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) (physical, sexual, and injury-related) [71]. | Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month follow-up | |
We also used the four-item Jellinek Inventory for assessing Partner Violence [72]. | Baseline | ||
Last, we assessed IPV using a two-item self-efficacy inventory that gauges participants’ attempts to make or update a safety plan, or obtain either an order of protection or a restraining order. | Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month follow-up | ||
Linkage to and retention in HIV and STI treatment | We assessed linkage to and retention in HIV and STI treatment using self-reported items gauging the receipt of medical care for HIV. | Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month follow-up | |
ART adherence | We also assessed linkage to and retention in HIV and STI treatment using self-reported items inquiring about the use of ART | Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month follow-up | |
Criminal justice involvement and recidivism | Self-reported items assessing number of times stopped, detained, arrested, and convicted of a crime during assessment time frames. | Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month follow-up | |
Moderators | Sociodemographics | Self-reported data collected on age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, income, and marital status. | Baseline |
Psychosocial characteristics | Depression is assessed using the four-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. | Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month follow-up | |
Posttraumatic stress experienced in the past month was assessed using the PCL-C [73], a standardized self-report rating 17-item scale that corresponds to the key symptoms of PTSD. | Baseline, 12-month follow-up | ||
We use the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire to assess lifetime exposure to traumatic events [74]. | Baseline | ||
CFIR construct: outer setting (Environmental-level characteristics) | Questions that focus on the external environment of all recruitment and intervention locations (i.e., probation sites, NGO community reentry provider locations, recruitment locations, strategies and techniques). Assessed using structured qualitative interviews and computerized surveys administered to NGO community reentry facilitators at repeated time points. | Ongoing | |
CFIR construct: inner setting (organization-level characteristics) | Items inquiring about the feasibility of implementing the intervention in all identified locations; the structural characteristics, networks and communication, culture, climate and readiness for implementation of the implementation organization, recruitment sites and probation locations. Also assessed using structured qualitative interviews and computerized surveys administered to NGO community reentry facilitators at repeated time points. | Baseline, repeated assessments | |
CFIR construct: individuals setting (staff-level characteristics) | Self-reported questions that capture NGO community reentry facilitators’ readiness to adopt the intervention; knowledge and beliefs about the intervention that might influence adoption; self-efficacy regarding ability to deliver the intervention; individual identification with organization; attitudes about technology (e.g., perception about how hard it is to use, how hard to administer to participants); and other personal attributes. | Baseline, repeated assessments | |
CFIR construct: intervention characteristics | Determined using self-reported survey questions, this construct examines: community reentry facilitators’ and organizational providers’ attitudes towards the intervention; and features of the intervention itself (the use of a tablet to deliver the intervention, adaptability, complexity, design) that might compromise or facilitate implementation. | Baseline, repeated assessments | |
CFIR construct: process | These self-reported inventory items captures and processes activities associated with preplanning and early engagement and implementation, supervision of intervention, and evaluation of the intervention. | Baseline, repeated assessments |