Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Oct 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cynthia Bell|
|5 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - M Briel|
|16 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Patricia Healy|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - M Briel|
|23 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cynthia Bell|
|8 Feb 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Patricia Healy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Feb 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|1 Mar 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13063-018-2544-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.