Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
22 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cynthia Bell
5 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - M Briel
16 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Patricia Healy
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - M Briel
23 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cynthia Bell
8 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Patricia Healy
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
13 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
1 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13063-018-2544-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement