Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Recovery of muscle function after deep neuromuscular block by means of diaphragm ultrasonography and adductor of pollicis acceleromyography with comparison of neostigmine vs. sugammadex as reversal drugs: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
27 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Iacopo Cappellini
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Girard
14 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gregory Lyle Bryson
12 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Iacopo Cappellini
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Iacopo Cappellini
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
21 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13063-018-2525-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement