Quality of reporting of outcomes in phase III studies of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luigia Scudeller|
|8 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Evelyne Kestelyn|
|19 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Bonnett|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luigia Scudeller|
|25 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ying Zhang|
|24 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Bonnett|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luigia Scudeller|
|3 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ying Zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|5 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|21 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13063-018-2522-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.