Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
12 Sep 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Melmer
9 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Bravo
8 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Melanie Schipfer
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Melmer
15 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Melanie Schipfer
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
18 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
5 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13063-018-2479-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement