Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Sep 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andreas Melmer|
|9 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laura Bravo|
|8 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Melanie Schipfer|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andreas Melmer|
|15 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Melanie Schipfer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|5 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13063-018-2479-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.