Skip to main content

Table 3 Overview of instruments with associated assessment points

From: Effectiveness of a transdiagnostic individually tailored Internet-based and mobile-supported intervention for the indicated prevention of depression and anxiety (ICare Prevent) in Dutch college students: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Measure (instrument) Assessment point
T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
Screening
 Depression (CES-D) X      
 Anxiety (GAD-7) X   X X X X
 Demographic data X      
 Mental disorder diagnosis self-reported X      
 Experience with psychotherapy X      
 Clinical diagnosis (M.I.N.I.) X     X X
Primary outcomes
 Depression (QIDS) X    X X X
 Anxiety (SIGH-A) X    X X X
Secondary outcomes
 Depression (PHQ-9)   X X X X X
 Anxiety (GAD-7) X   X X X X
 Clinical diagnosis (M.I.N.I.) X     X X
 Academic performance (PSS, ECTS)   X X X X X
Cost-effectiveness
 Costs (CSRI)   X    X X
Other outcomes
 Alcohol use (AUDIT-C)   X X X X X
 Alliance (WAI-SR)a    X    
 Behavioral activation (BADS-SF)   X   X X X
 Reasons for dropouta     X   
 Expectations (CEQ)   X     
 Incongruence (INKK)   X   X X X
 Motivation (TEQ)   X X X   
 Negative effects of treatment (INEP)a     X   
 Personality (BFI-10)   X     
 Potential risk factorsb   X     
 Program evaluation (CSQ-8)a    X X   
 Quality of life (AQoL, EQ-5D-8 L)   X   X X X
 Resilience (CD-RISC)   X X X X X
 Sleep quality (PSQI)   X   X X X
 Supporta    X    
 Wellbeing (WHO-5)   X   X X X
 Worry (PSWQ-3)   X   X X X
  1. aOnly in intervention groups
  2. bOptional
  3. T0 screening, T1 baseline, T2 after completion of session 5 or 5 weeks after randomization, T3 post intervention, T4 6-month follow-up, T5 12-month follow-up
Back to article page

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215