Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: The HYSTER study: the effect of intracervically administered terlipressin versus placebo on the number of gaseous emboli and fluid intravasation during hysteroscopic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Atallah
6 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elena Bignami
16 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Lucilla Overdijk
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Atallah
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
14 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13063-018-2442-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.