This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Global health trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 14 July 2017
Accepted: 2 January 2018
Published: 5 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Jul 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - J Bines|
|27 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shaun Treweek|
|17 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Rosala-Hallas|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shaun Treweek|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|5 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13063-018-2440-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.