Skip to main content

Table 1 Changes in CONSORT checklist item

From: Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in patients with HIV on antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review

CONSORT 2010

CONSORT 1996

CONSORT 2001

CONSORT 2010

Section

Topic

Checklist item

Item no

Item no

Item no

Title and abstract

Identification as a randomized trial in the title

1

1*

1a

Structured summary of trial design, methods, results, and conclusions (for specific guidance see CONSORT for abstracts)

2

-

1b

Introduction

Background and objectives

Scientific background and explanation of rationale

-

2

2a

Specific objectives or hypotheses

3

5*

2b

Methods

Trial design

Description of trial design (such as parallel, factorial), including allocation ratio

-

-

3a

Important changes to methods after trial commencement (such as eligibility, criteria), with reasons

-

-

3b

Participants

Eligibility criteria for participants

4

3*

4a*

Settings and locations where the data were collected

-

4b*

Interventions

The interventions for each group with sufficient details to allow replication, including how and when they were actually administered

5

4*

5*

Outcomes

Completely defined pre-specified primary and secondary outcome measures, including how and when they were assessed

6

6*

6a*

Any changes to trial outcomes after the trial commenced, with reasons

-

-

6b

Sample size

How sample size was determined

6

7*

7a*

When applicable, explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines

8

7b*

Randomization

Sequence generation

Method used to generate the random allocation sequence

10

8*

8a

Type of randomization; details of any restriction (such as blocking and block size)

9

8b

Allocation concealment mechanism

Mechanism used to implement the random allocation sequence (such as sequentially numbered containers), describing any steps taken to conceal the sequence until interventions were assigned

11

9*

9*

Implementation

Who generated the random allocation sequence, who enrolled participants, and who assigned participants to interventions

12

10*

10

Blinding

If done, who was blinded after assignment to interventions (for example, participants, care providers, those assessing outcomes) and how

13

11*

11a*

If relevant, description of the similarity of interventions

11b*

Statistical methods

Statistical methods used to compare groups for primary

7

12*

12a*

and secondary outcomes

-

-

Methods for additional analyses, such as subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses

3

12*

12b*

Results

Participant flow (a diagram is strongly recommended)

For each group, the numbers of participants who were randomly assigned received intended treatment, and were analyzed for the primary outcome

14

13*

13a

For each group, losses and exclusions after randomization, together with reasons

19

13b

Recruitment

Dates defining the periods of recruitment and follow-up

-

14

14a*

Why the trial ended or was stopped

-

14b

Baseline data

A table showing baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for each group

-

15

15

Numbers analyzed

For each group, the number of participants (denominator) included in each analysis and whether the analysis was by original assigned groups

16

16*

16

Outcomes and estimation

For each primary and secondary outcome, results for each group, and the estimated effect size and its precision (such as 95% confidence interval)

15

17*

17a*

Outcomes and estimation

For binary outcomes, presentation of both absolute and relative effect sizes is recommended

18

17b*

Ancillary analyses

Results of any other analyses performed, including subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses, distinguishing pre-specified from exploratory

17

18*

18

Harms

All important harms or unintended effects (for specific guidance see CONSORT for harms)

-

19

19

Discussion

Limitations

Trial limitations, addressing sources of potential bias, imprecision, and, if relevant, multiplicity of analyses

20

20*

20*

Generalizability

Generalizability (external validity, applicability) of the trial findings

21*

21

Interpretation

Interpretation consistent with results, balancing benefits and harms, and considering other relevant evidence

21

22*

22*

Other information

Registration

Registration number and name of trial registry

-

-

23

Protocol

Where the full trial protocol can be accessed, if available

-

-

24

Funding

Sources of funding and other support (such as supply of drugs), role of funders

-

-

25

  1. *Items were enhanced for specificity of appraisal
  2. Items were simplified and clarified regarding the wording
  3. - indicates the absence of an item
  4. For the 2001 and 2010 CONSORT checklist, the item number in the article is shown. As for the 1996 checklist, there was no item number listed in the article, so item numbers were assigned according to the order shown in the original article