Development of a core outcome set for studies involving patients undergoing major lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease: study protocol for a systematic review and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Jul 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Boney|
|29 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gregory Bryson|
|28 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Graeme Ambler|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gregory Bryson|
|12 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Boney|
|16 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Graeme Ambler|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13063-017-2358-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.