Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Impact of a deferred recruitment model in a randomised controlled trial in primary care (CREAM study)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
9 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Arundel
11 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caitlyn Ellerbe
12 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suzanne Breeman
17 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lynda Constable
8 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Victoria Shepherd
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caitlyn Ellerbe
19 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Arundel
29 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suzanne Breeman
20 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lynda Constable
26 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Victoria Shepherd
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
26 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
10 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-2284-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement