Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Framing the conversation: use of PRECIS-2 ratings to advance understanding of pragmatic trial design domains

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Atallah
2 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Felipe CastaƱeda
19 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Paula Darby Lipman
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
10 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-2267-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.