Framing the conversation: use of PRECIS-2 ratings to advance understanding of pragmatic trial design domains
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Atallah|
|2 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Felipe Castañeda|
|19 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Paula Darby Lipman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|10 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13063-017-2267-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.