This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Efficacy and safety of a balanced salt solution versus a 0.9% saline infusion for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (BASIC trial): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
- Hyung Ah Jo†1,
- Sehoon Park†2,
- Chan-Duck Kim3,
- Hee-Yeon Jung3,
- Jang-Hee Cho3,
- Ran-hui Cha4,
- Ea Wha Kang5,
- Tae Ik Chang5,
- Sejoong Kim6,
- Hyung-Jong Kim7,
- Byung Ha Chung8,
- Jung Pyo Lee9,
- Jung Tak Park10,
- Seung Hyeok Han10,
- Tae-Hyun Yoo10,
- Dong-Ryeol Ryu11,
- Sung Jin Moon12,
- Jae Hyun Chang13,
- Dong Ki Kim1 and
- Kwon Wook Joo1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 18 November 2016
Accepted: 13 September 2017
Published: 5 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian Weiner|
|21 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ivan Pavlov|
|13 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Hyung Ah Jo|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|5 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13063-017-2202-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.