Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effectiveness of two web-based cognitive bias modification interventions targeting approach and attentional bias in gambling problems: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

Trials201718:452

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2190-2

Received: 20 July 2016

Accepted: 12 September 2017

Published: 3 October 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Esther Valero
5 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lorraine Locke
15 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marilisa Boffo
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
12 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
3 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-2190-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Addiction Development and Psychopathology (ADAPT) lab, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam
(2)
Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Antwerp University (UA)
(3)
Centre for Alcohol and other Substance Problems (CAD Limburg)
(4)
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam

Advertisement