Evidence-based practice within nutrition: what are the barriers for improving the evidence and how can they be dealt with?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - J. V. Woodside|
|26 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Martine Laville|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - J. V. Woodside|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13063-017-2160-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.