Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gillian Shorter|
|25 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cushla Cooper|
|1 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vicki Barber|
|29 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Kearney|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gillian Shorter|
|24 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cushla Cooper|
|27 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vicki Barber|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|31 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13063-017-2132-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.