Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
7 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
23 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gillian Shorter
25 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cushla Cooper
1 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vicki Barber
29 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anna Kearney
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gillian Shorter
24 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cushla Cooper
27 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vicki Barber
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
27 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
31 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-2132-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement