Core Outcome Domains for early phase clinical trials of sound-, psychology-, and pharmacology-based interventions to manage chronic subjective tinnitus in adults: the COMIT’ID study protocol for using a Delphi process and face-to-face meetings to establish consensus
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Apr 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iain Bruce|
|14 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jane Blazeby|
|25 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kathryn Fackrell|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|23 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13063-017-2123-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.