Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Standardising the reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials: protocol for the development of a core outcome set and accompanying outcome measurement instrument set (the GASTROS study)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
28 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
2 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dean Thompson
4 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ming Chen
13 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dirk Wilhelm
5 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bilal Alkhaffaf
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dean Thompson
12 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ming Chen
21 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dirk Wilhelm
29 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bilal Alkhaffaf
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dean Thompson
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
9 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-2100-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement