Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Retroclavicular approach vs infraclavicular approach for plexic bloc anesthesia of the upper limb: study protocol randomized controlled trial

  • PL Langlois1Email author,
  • AF Gil-Blanco1,
  • D Jessop2,
  • Y Sansoucy1,
  • F D’Aragon1,
  • N Albert2 and
  • P Echave1
Trials201718:346

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2086-1

Received: 7 December 2016

Accepted: 5 July 2017

Published: 21 July 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
9 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - W.H. Nofal
10 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Everardo Saad
26 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Pascal Laferriere-Langlois
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
5 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
21 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-2086-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS)
(2)
Department of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Laval (CHUL)

Advertisement