Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A large cluster randomized trial of outcome-based pathways to improve home-based wound care

  • 1, 3Email author,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 2 and
  • 5, 6
Trials201718:393

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2082-5

Received: 9 May 2016

Accepted: 1 July 2017

Published: 29 August 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
9 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Boutron
22 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Merrick Zwarenstein
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
1 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
29 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-2082-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
(2)
TAGlab (Technologies for Aging Gracefully lab.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(3)
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Western Satellite Site, London, Canada
(4)
HOPE Research Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
(5)
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
(6)
Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Advertisement