Fig. 1
From: A comparison of approaches for adjudicating outcomes in clinical trials
Performance of combination approach, with one site assessor and two central assessors, compared with other strategies. CA, central assessor; SA, site assessor. a Site assessor, 10% false-positive rate and 10% false-negative rate; central assessor, 5% false-positive rate. b Site assessor, 5% false-positive rate and 5% false-negative rate; central assessor, 10% false-positive rate. c Site assessor, 10% false-positive rate and 5% false-negative rate; central assessor, 5% false-positive rate. d Site assessor, 5% false-positive rate and 5% false-negative rate; central assessor, 5% false-positive rate