Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Does the use of the Informed Healthcare Choices (IHC) primary school resources improve the ability of grade-5 children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial

  • Allen Nsangi1, 3Email author,
  • Daniel Semakula1, 3,
  • Andrew D. Oxman2,
  • Matthew Oxman2,
  • Sarah Rosenbaum2,
  • Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren2,
  • Laetitia Nyirazinyoye4,
  • Margaret Kaseje5,
  • Iain Chalmers6,
  • Atle Fretheim2, 3 and
  • Nelson K. Sewankambo1

Received: 29 July 2016

Accepted: 28 April 2017

Published: 18 May 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
29 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annie LeBlanc
22 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Allen Nsangi
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
18 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-1958-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Makerere University, College of Health Sciences New Mulago Hospital Complex
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
University of Oslo
University of Rwanda
Great Lakes University of Kisumu
James Lind Initiative