TY - JOUR AU - Kennedy, Andrew D. M. AU - Torgerson, David J. AU - Campbell, Marion K. AU - Grant, Adrian M. PY - 2017 DA - 2017/05/02 TI - Subversion of allocation concealment in a randomised controlled trial: a historical case study JO - Trials SP - 204 VL - 18 IS - 1 AB - If the randomisation process within a trial is subverted, this can lead to selection bias that may invalidate the trial’s result. To avoid this problem, it is recommended that some form of concealment should be put into place. Despite ongoing anecdotal concerns about their susceptibility to subversion, a surprising number of trials (over 10%) still use sealed opaque envelopes as the randomisation method of choice. This is likely due in part to the paucity of empirical data quantifying the potential effects of subversion. In this study we report a historical before and after study that compares the use of the sealed envelope method with a more secure centralised telephone allocation approach in order to provide such empirical evidence of the effects of subversion. SN - 1745-6215 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1946-z DO - 10.1186/s13063-017-1946-z ID - Kennedy2017 ER -