Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinicians’ views and experiences of offering two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Julia Wade |
| 13 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leila Rooshenas |
| 29 Mar 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Celine Chhoa |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 29 Mar 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Apr 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Apr 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s13063-017-1940-5 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
