Skip to main content

Table 1 Objective structured assessment of the technical skills score for chest tube insertion

From: App-based serious gaming for training of chest tube insertion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Correct identification of incision location

1

Poor

The chosen dissection plane deviates tremendously from the suggested site

2

3

Sufficient

The chosen dissection plane deviates slightly from the suggested site

4

5

Excellent

4th/5th intercostal space; mid/anterior axillary line

Correct plane of dissection subcutaneously

1

Poor

Both distance or execution of tunneling lack accuracy

2

3

Sufficient

Either distance or execution of tunneling lack accuracy

4

5

Excellent

Both distance and execution of tunneling are accurate

Blunt dissection on top side of rib

1

Poor

Flawed dissection; not carried out on top side of rib

2

3

Sufficient

Solid dissection carried out with minor errors

4

5

Excellent

Confident cut through the subcutaneous layers and intercostal muscles

Scissors/clamp guarded with other hand during dissection and pulled out without closing the instrument

1

Poor

Hazardous handling that might affect the patient

2

3

Sufficient

Improvable handling

4

5

Excellent

Confident handling of the used instruments

Digital exploration of pleural cavity on chest wall to rule out adhesions

1

Poor

No digital exploration

2

3

Sufficient

Finger inserted in pleural cavity

4

5

Excellent

Digital exploration in 360° with turning of the wrist rules out adhesions

Drain guarded with hand while being inserted

1

Poor

Hazardous handling that might affect the patient

2

3

Sufficient

Improvable handling

4

5

Excellent

Confident handling of the used instruments

Drain inserted into pleural cavity

1

Poor

Tube advancement is carried out poorly

2

3

Sufficient

Tube advancement is carried out with minor errors

4

5

Excellent

Forceps unclamped in time and tube manually advanced.

Estimate made of drain length

1

Poor

Estimate deviates tremendously from rater’s opinion

2

3

Sufficient

Estimate deviates slightly from rater’s opinion

4

5

Excellent

Optimal estimate stated

Economy of time and motion

1

Poor

Many unnecessary/disorganized movements

2

3

Sufficient

Organized time/motion, some unnecessary movement

4

5

Excellent

Maximum economy of movement and efficiency

Amount of help/assistance needed from tutor

1

Poor

Task could not be carried out without extensive assistance

2

3

Sufficient

Trainee only raises important questions in order to maximize performance

4

5

Excellent

Almost no assistance needed; task is carried out confidently