This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Sample size determination for a binary response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 28 January 2016
Accepted: 9 January 2017
Published: 23 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Jan 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Heinz Schmidli|
|25 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leonhard Held|
|28 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Grieve|
|7 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Ciarleglio|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|23 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13063-017-1791-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.