Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Sample size determination for a binary response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure

Trials201718:83

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1791-0

Received: 28 January 2016

Accepted: 9 January 2017

Published: 23 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jan 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Heinz Schmidli
25 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leonhard Held
28 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Grieve
7 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Maria Ciarleglio
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
9 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-1791-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health
(2)
Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, VA Cooperative Studies Program
(3)
Air Force Office of Scientific Research

Advertisement