Skip to content

Advertisement

Trials

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Reporting of critical care trial abstracts: a comparison before and after the announcement of CONSORT guideline for abstracts

Contributed equally
Trials201718:32

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1786-x

Received: 8 September 2016

Accepted: 5 January 2017

Published: 21 January 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Priyanga Ranasinghe
14 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mickael VOURC'H
26 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Akira Kuriyama
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mickael VOURC'H
5 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Priyanga Ranasinghe
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
5 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
21 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13063-017-1786-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Yoshida-Konoe-cho Sakyo-ku

Advertisement