This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Reporting of critical care trial abstracts: a comparison before and after the announcement of CONSORT guideline for abstracts
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 8 September 2016
Accepted: 5 January 2017
Published: 21 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Priyanga Ranasinghe|
|14 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mickael VOURC'H|
|26 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Akira Kuriyama|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mickael VOURC'H|
|5 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Priyanga Ranasinghe|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13063-017-1786-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.