Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Gentamicin versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of gonorrhoea (G-TOG trial): study protocol for a randomised trial

  • Clare Brittain1,
  • Margaret Childs1,
  • Lelia Duley1,
  • Jan Harding2,
  • Trish Hepburn1,
  • Garry Meakin1,
  • Alan A. Montgomery1,
  • Wei Tan1 and
  • Jonathan D. C. Ross2Email author
Trials201617:558

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1683-8

Received: 27 August 2016

Accepted: 5 November 2016

Published: 24 November 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
5 Nov 2016 Editorially accepted
24 Nov 2016 Article published 10.1186/s13063-016-1683-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Queen’s Medical Centre
(2)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Whittall Street Clinic

Advertisement