Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Gentamicin versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of gonorrhoea (G-TOG trial): study protocol for a randomised trial

  • Clare Brittain1,
  • Margaret Childs1,
  • Lelia Duley1,
  • Jan Harding2,
  • Trish Hepburn1,
  • Garry Meakin1,
  • Alan A. Montgomery1,
  • Wei Tan1 and
  • Jonathan D. C. Ross2Email author

Received: 27 August 2016

Accepted: 5 November 2016

Published: 24 November 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
27 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Nov 2016 Editorially accepted
24 Nov 2016 Article published 10.1186/s13063-016-1683-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Whittall Street Clinic, Birmingham, UK