A priori criteria | Findings | Objective met? (yes/no) |
---|---|---|
Recruitment rate was ≥2 participants per month fitting the eligibility criteria | Recruitment rate was 1.36 eligible participants per month | No |
The study recruited ≥70 % of all eligible potential participants | 62.50 % of all eligible participants were recruited | No |
Of the participants recruited to acupuncture group ≥90 % received their first acupuncture treatment within 1 week of recruitment | All participants received their first acupuncture treatment within 1 week of recruitment | Yes |
After randomisation and allocation ≥90 % of participants received treatment as initially intended | All participants received treatment as intended and the study protocol was considered acceptable | Yes |
Of the participants recruited to acupuncture group ≥80 % received all 8 acupuncture treatments | No participants received all 8 treatments (mean total number of treatments 5.14 (4.02–6.27)) | No |
Of the participants recruited to usual care group ≤10 % dropped out of the study | One participant (14.29 %) of participants dropped out of the usual care group | No |
At the primary endpoint of the study outcome measures were completed by ≥90 % of participants | 100 % of participants still enrolled on the study completed all outcome measures by the primary endpoint of the study | Yes |
At 1 month after completion of the study, outcome measures were completed by ≥60 % of participants | Outcome measures were completed by 5 participants (33.33 %) | No |
Qualitative data identified that outcome measures were acceptable and appropriate, that questionnaires and rating scales were easy to complete and that outcome measures could be identified for use in a definitive trial | Outcome measures were considered acceptable, appropriate and easy to complete. The HADS, PSS-10, EQ-5D-5Â L, and ISI may not be appropriate for use in a definitive trial | Yes |
Qualitative data implied that acupuncture was an acceptable and effective intervention for treating PLP with or without other secondary symptoms | Acupuncture/electroacupuncture was considered acceptable. Acupuncture was perceived to be effective at treating both PLP and other secondary complaints | Yes |
Data were collected on the primary outcome measure (NRS) and effect size was calculated to inform a sample size calculation for a larger trial | Considering a 20Â % dropout rate, 170 participants are recommended to be recruited to detect a significant change in a two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial comparing usual care and acupuncture as measured using an 11-point NRS measuring average pain at 4Â weeks | Yes |
Qualitative and quantitative data implied that the acupuncture protocol used in the feasibility study was appropriate for use in a definitive multicentred randomised controlled trial | Participants did not drop out of the acupuncture group suggesting that it was acceptable. Participants’ symptoms generally improved over 6 treatments suggesting that 8 treatments was adequate. Acupuncture and electroacupuncture were considered acceptable, effective, and relaxing | Yes |
The researcher was not aware which group participants had been enrolled to 100Â % of the time | Blinding was not successful and the researcher knew through both participants and clinical staff at the amputee unit their group allocation | No |