PRECIS criteria for pragmatic trials | Design of suicide prevention outreach trial | |
---|---|---|
Participants | All eligible participants enrolled, regardless of risk, responsiveness, comorbidities or past compliance | Adult health plan members reporting frequent suicidal ideation on routine depression questionnaires are automatically enrolled |
Intervention condition | Interventions are highly flexible, offering providers leeway in formulation and application | Both interventions allow personalization to patients’ needs and preferences. Varying levels of participation are expected |
Intervention practitioners | Interventions are applied by the full range of practitioners in the full range of settings with only ordinary attention to dose and side effects | Intervention clinicians will be recruited from existing local workforces. Each site will be responsible for selection and supervision of clinicians (using standard quality control tools) |
Comparison condition | “Usual practice” (or the best alternative), offering practitioners considerable leeway in application | Each prevention program will be compared to usual care |
Comparison practitioners | The control intervention is applied by the full range of clinicians in the full range of settings, with only ordinary attention to training, experience, and performance | Usual care will be provided by real-world providers (mental health and general medical clinicians) under usual practice conditions – with no additional training or supervision |
Follow-up assessments | There are no research assessments; administrative databases are searched for outcomes | All outcome data are collected from EHR, insurance claim data, and death certificate data |
Outcome definition | The primary outcome is objectively measured, meaningful to study participants, and does not depend on central adjudication | Primary and secondary outcomes are defined by specific ICD-9/ICD-10 diagnosis codes – no clinical assessment is required |
Intervention compliance | There are no special strategies to improve compliance, and compliance is unobtrusively measured | Patients assigned to interventions are free to participate (or not participate) at any level. Participation or compliance is assessed passively using EHRs and online intervention databases |
Practitioner adherence | There are no special strategies to maintain practitioner adherence, and adherence is unobtrusively measured | Care managers and skills coaches work independently at each site, but receive initial training and regular supervision from study investigators |
Primary comparison | The analysis includes all patients regardless of compliance, eligibility, or others | All outcomes will be analyzed according to initial assignment – regardless of intervention participation or compliance |