Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the analytical (theoretical/philosophical) research

Trials201617:443

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1562-3

Received: 21 May 2016

Accepted: 19 August 2016

Published: 9 September 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
19 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
9 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s13063-016-1562-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied, University of Leeds
(2)
Public Policy, Social Science Research Unit, EPPI-Centre, UCL Institute of Education
(3)
Clinical Trials Research, Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Nottingham Health Science Partners, University of Nottingham
(4)
National Childbirth Trust
(5)
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds

Advertisement