How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 1 September 2015
Accepted: 9 July 2016
Published: 13 September 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean-Sebastien Renaud|
|21 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Minji Lee|
|3 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Cecilia AC Prinsen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean-Sebastien Renaud|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Jul 2016||Editorially accepted|
|13 Sep 2016||Article published||10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.