Skip to content



What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluation of a novel information resource for patients with bronchiectasis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

  • Katy L. M. Hester1Email author,
  • Julia Newton2,
  • Tim Rapley3 and
  • Anthony De Soyza1, 4

Received: 3 February 2016

Accepted: 7 April 2016

Published: 23 April 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
3 Feb 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Apr 2016 Editorially accepted
23 Apr 2016 Article published 10.1186/s13063-016-1330-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University
Adult Bronchiectasis service, Freeman Hospital