Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of meta-analysis results for the individual MedDRA preferred term serious adverse events pooled across all five trials

From: Reporting of harms outcomes: a comparison of journal publications with unpublished clinical study reports of orlistat trials

Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

 

Breakdown of serious adverse events reporting

Meta-analysis characteristic

Total

Once in the clinical study report (CSR) and journal publication

CSR

Journal publication

Number of SAE terms reported (% of total)

326

14 (4 %)

311 (95 %)

1 (<1 %)

Direction of the pooled risk effect in the meta-analysis

 

For all 14 SAEs, there is agreement in direction of the pooled risk effect between the pairing of documents

• 16 (5 %) showed increased pooled risk of SAE on orlistat

• 281 (90 %) showed no difference

• 14 (5 %) showed an increased pooled risk of SAE on placebo

The one SAE showed increased pooled risk on placebo

SAE listings for when there is a change in effect including statistical significance

  

Two (13 %) of the 16 SAEs were statistically significant; carotid artery stenosis, varicose veins a

One SAE; encephalomyelitis was statistically non-significant

  1. Footnote:
  2. aThese serious adverse events were mild and unrelated to treatment